*The only one of such messages that I will exempt from the forthcoming diatribe belongs to the Zeph, because his, "if this message looks like I typed with my elbows..." is at least humorous.
Now I get that typing on a tiny little touch screen is more difficult and perhaps makes one more prone to typing errors (though with the autocomplete feature, such an assertion is debatable--more likely than spelling errors are autocompleting an unintended word errors). That's fine.
But does reading from a little screen prevent you from reading what you wrote? I mean you just read the message you're responding to and seemed to not have any problems. So why can't you read what you wrote to make sure you spelled everything right. Don't you do that anyway? And especially don't you read what you wrote if you're sending a "reply all" to something like 2,000 employees* of a major corporation?
*Another topic from which I'll spare you my rare but fun rants is the tendency at my current employer to send "reply all" messages to release announcements redundantly reiterating the congratulatory message of the original. It seems that there is a direct correlation between one's perceived relative importance and one's propensity to send such a response. But I'm guessing that nobody is keeping track of whether all the VPs and the most self-important of the directors have sent such a response. OK, I guess I didn't spare you the rant and you got a tangential rant instead. Moving on.
I think I'm going to make a new footer that says "Please excuse any typos. Though I may or may not have sent this from my mobile device, I was too lazy to proofread my massage."
Even proofreading can be dicey from an iPhone. Sometimes you try to RFID (that last word was SUPPOSED to be "fix") the word and it mutates to something even more bizarre and it posts at the same time. I imagine the RIM thing is no better. Bringing a laptop along for coffee is a comparative PIA so this is simply another facet of modern life. Your proposed footer might catch on and THEN where would we be?
ReplyDeletea more appropriate footer would be "please excuse any typos, i typed this while driving my suv 74 miles per hour on the freeway, trying to meet some friends for a ride, and hoping you won't notice i'm not at my desk for a while."
ReplyDeletecoach factory outlet online
ReplyDeletecheap jordan shoes
ghd hair dryer
kobe 11
louis vuitton purse
coach outlet online
sac longchamp pliage
oakley vault outlet store
nike air max 90
polo ralph lauren
louis vuitton handbags
prada sunglasses wholesale
stan smith adidas
louis vuitton handbags
cheap jordans
tiffany jewelry outlet
longchamp bag
tiffany uk
jimmy choo outlet store
polo ralph lauren men
ray ban sunglasses
louboutin outlet
valentino
yeezy boost 350 white
moncler uk
hollister kids
cheap ray bans
christian louboutin sale
ray bans
cartier
white converse
fitflops
ghd
20160803caiyan
roshe run flyknit
ReplyDeletecheap ugg boots
ugg australia
instyler max
adidas yeezy 350
ralph lauren
ralph lauren polo
adidas nmd runner
michael kors handbags
pittsburgh steelers jerseys
hzx20170119
What's more, if such ski boots are of any quality, that implies they're likely all around overwhelming. How would you guess you'll haul around your skis and all its going with hardware? With a ski boot bag, that is the secret!Best ski boot bags
ReplyDelete